Skip to main content

Write a PREreview

Weighing Faculty Research Contribution in Institutional Growth and Incentivization

Posted
Server
Preprints.org
DOI
10.20944/preprints202503.1733.v1

Institutional rankings significantly influence higher education, research funding, and faculty incentives. In the Indian Ranking System (NIRF - Engineering Category), research parameters contribute 22.5%, directly impacting funding eligibility and institutional growth. Institutions struggle to quantify faculty research contributions for ranking and funding purposes. A standardized framework is required to evaluate and incentivize research outputs fairly. This study proposes a method for assigning weightage to authorship positions in collaborative publications, ensuring accurate faculty contribution assessment. To develop a fair and transparent author weightage system that supports institutional ranking calculations and incentive structures. A proportional weightage system is introduced, where the primary corresponding author and first author receives 50% credit, and the rest is distributed among co-authors. An incentive model based on journal quartiles and collaboration levels is proposed. The framework allows institutions to evaluate faculty contributions systematically, aiding in ranking, funding, and incentives. Future modifications can integrate SDG-focused research, corporate collaborations, and international partnerships for enhanced impact.

You can write a PREreview of Weighing Faculty Research Contribution in Institutional Growth and Incentivization. A PREreview is a review of a preprint and can vary from a few sentences to a lengthy report, similar to a journal-organized peer-review report.

Before you start

We will ask you to log in with your ORCID iD. If you don’t have an iD, you can create one.

What is an ORCID iD?

An ORCID iD is a unique identifier that distinguishes you from everyone with the same or similar name.

Start now